Everybody Wants Somethin': Part IV - Gilmore Girls

Where you lead, I will follow… unless it's towards a second season.

If Lizzie McGuire demonstrates the difficulty of rebooting a show for its original audience, Gilmore Girls adds another layer of complexity. Unlike with rebooted children’s programs, the Gilmore Girls audience were never children. With Lizzie, there is a built-in reason to reboot the show: Lizzie has grown-up. We want to follow the leap from adolescents to adulthood for a character that is just so identifiable as we now navigate those thirty-something waters. When rebooting a program of adult characters for an adult audience, you better have a damn good reason to bring the show back.

Gilmore Girls ran from 2000-2007 for seven seasons. The seventh season, however, was lacking creator Amy Sherman-Palladino. After failed negotiations with the network, Amy and her partner Dan Palladino left the series. Palladino knew the last four words of the series since she initially thought of the concept for the show. She guarded these words, not expressing them publicly during the final season, as she did not want to distract from the show still in progress. Until Gilmore Girls: A Year in the Life, those words remained secret.

Projects can change creators and be of equal or higher quality. It is widely agreed that, with Gilmore Girls, that was sadly not the case. This show has always been by Palladino. Because of the seventh season, we now know definitively that she is the best person at the helm of this story. The seventh season was off-brand, and the cast has even spoken a dislike for it. Lauren Graham said in an interview that she forgot her character got married which happened in that infamous 7th season. Gilmore Girls specifically needed a conclusion. They did not need a handoff like Raven’s Home or a continuation like Lizzie McGuire.

I have already spoken to who this story should be by. Regarding of, and shared experience, Gilmore Girls has another unique quality. Audiences and production have gone so far as to say they wish they could ignore the 7th season and finish the story without some of those plot points in continuity. Sometimes, our shared experiences are not perfect, and a reboot can be used to save the sacredness of those experiences by giving them the conclusion they deserve.

Gilmore Girls: A Year in the Life is for the exact same population of viewers that watched Gilmore Girls. We have a smaller time lapse occurring over a less developmental time of the main characters’ lives. We are merely picking up the pieces and putting them together the way the original creator intended. Because the focus of A Year in the Life was on conclusion, I argue the stakes were higher than any other form of reboot. With a continuation, you have time to reach an ending. With a handoff, you do not have the pressure of keeping your original audience happy. They are providing a strict conclusion to an original audience that has had nine years to re-watch, process, and consider how Gilmore Girls might have ended.

Unconfirmed rumors have circulated over a second season of A Year in the Life, with Lauren Graham admitting she has a “Gilmore Girls clause” written into her contracts so she can always cozy up to the bar at Luke’s should the opportunity present. As much as I love our shared admiration for the character of Lorelai, I hope there isn’t a second season. I would love to live in Stars Hollow forever, but I got my conclusion. While reactions on A Year in the Life’s conclusion were mixed, I was perfectly fulfilled. I understood why those four words came to Palladino before the series ever got started. Personally, seeing the always-idolized Rory struggle with adulthood and the always-burdened Lorelai get a fairytale she alone deserves was exactly what we needed. The last four words were a realistic, relatable, and satisfying moment we could grab onto as those who found their adult footing with these characters. A Year in the Life taught me that no one, no matter how perfect they are believed to be, is immune from life, adulthood, and failure. It also taught me to never give up on that fairytale ending. Like Lorelei, in order to get that fairytale, the biggest hurdle is being honest with myself on what that fairytale looks like.

On a final, side note, I always like a good fan theory. After A Year in the Life, one surfaced that argued that only A Year in the Life was reality within the Gilmore Girls universe, and the first seven seasons were Rory’s book. This remains just that - a fan theory- but it does describe Rory’s rose-colored views and ambitions held as a celebrated youth compared to her facing the realities of adulthood. My views, along with this fan theory, signify the importance of A Year in the Life giving us an ending - the ideal balance between a fulfilling conclusion and an open-ended moment perfect for fantasizing about these characters for the rest of our lives, bringing us back to Stars Hollow again and again. Any additional content would dilute the material we have and take away from the balance that has been achieved between both fulfilling conclusion and never-ending interpretation.

Use of Shared Experience and Audience Focus in Reboot Television

 

Use of
Shared Experience:

 

A tool to connect a previous product to a new one. To wrap up the loose ends and move on to your new audience.


For OG Audience (Children)
à
For NEW Audience (Children)

That’s So Raven(’s) Home


For OG Audience (Children)
à For OG Audience (Adults)

Lizzie McGuire

  

Use of
Shared Experience:

 

 

To continue, and ultimately finish, a story for the same audience.


For OG Audience (Children) à
For OG and New Audience (Children and Adult)





For OG Audience (Adults) à
For OG Audience (Adults)



Gilmore Girls / A Year in the Life

 

For Whom: Original or New Audience


Popular Posts